In recent years I’ve had rather too much to do with horse vets. Not on my own account, I hasten to add, but because of the people and horses with whom I’ve come into contact.
There was a time, not so long ago either, when a visit from the vet for a horse or pony in medium work would have been a relative rarity. Common ailments and injuries would have been dealt with by the owner, or some knowledgeable and experienced horseman or woman.
Such horse people might also have accompanied the prospective horse owner to view an animal for potential purchase. They would have been good judges of equine conformation and temperament, and of conditions which appropriate management could make good, or substantially improve upon, as distinct from those which should be avoided at all costs.
Unfortunately, some modern horse vets are not aware such distinctions. It is not uncommon, in my experience, for a horse with a condition which could be effectively managed through the right care and exercise to “fail the vet”, while one with a conformation which may dispose it to serious problems is “passed”.
The matter of a horse’s size is a useful illustration of this lack of judgement. All the classical “manuals of horsemanship” state that horses over 16hh are more prone to ailments and injuries than those below this size (although there are of course exceptions). Yet modern vets seem unaware that size matters. Why, I wonder.